Activity reporting dressed as performance
Sends, opens, replies. None of them tell you whether the programme made money, and open rates in particular have been unreliable since privacy protections started pre-fetching images.
Every reply accounted for, from first touch to closed revenue.
Most outbound reporting stops at the meeting, which is precisely where the interesting questions start. Which segment produced revenue, not just replies? Which angle brought deals that closed? Without that loop, you are optimising the top of a funnel with no idea what the bottom did with it.
The problem
Sends, opens, replies. None of them tell you whether the programme made money, and open rates in particular have been unreliable since privacy protections started pre-fetching images.
Deals sit in stages nobody has updated, because updating them is manual work reps avoid. A forecast built on that data is fiction with a chart.
~25%
of a rep's working week consumed by manual CRM data entrysource ↗
Six months later the origin of the deal is lost. So the next budget conversation is settled by whoever argues best rather than by what worked.
What we do
Entry and exit criteria written down for every stage, so 'qualified' and 'proposal' mean the same thing to everyone and a forecast is comparable month to month.
Campaign, segment, sequence and angle stamped on the contact at first touch and carried through to close. No manual tagging that will quietly stop happening.
Replies, meetings and outcomes written back automatically. If a rep has to copy it across, the data will be wrong within a month.
Contacted, replied, meeting booked, meeting held, opportunity, closed — with conversion between each step, split by segment.
Segments that produce revenue get more list; segments that produce meetings and no revenue get cut. That feedback is the entire point of the reporting.
What you get
How we’re different
The funnel runs all the way to closed-won. It is the only version that tells you whether to spend more.
Because we build the integrations, the data arrives without anyone remembering to record it. Manual attribution always decays.
Built in your CRM or BI tool, not in an agency portal you lose access to when the contract ends.
Questions we get
The CRM is the container; this is the discipline that makes what is inside it trustworthy. Most CRMs we inherit have good software and unusable data, because nothing was defined and nothing was automatic.
HubSpot, Zoho, Pipedrive, Salesforce and Odoo, plus custom builds where the process genuinely does not fit an off-the-shelf pipeline. We would rather adapt to your stack than sell you a migration you did not ask for.
Two to four weeks for stage definitions, attribution and dashboards on a standard CRM. Longer if the existing data needs deduplicating and cleaning first, which it usually does.
Where the numbers come from
Figures are industry benchmarks published by third parties, cited so you can check them. They describe the market, not a promise about your results.
We'll connect the tooling to your CRM and build the funnel view from first touch to closed revenue.
Usually paired with
Your pipeline, your rules — software shaped around how you actually sell.
Read →Numbers you can act on, in one place, that everyone agrees are correct.
Read →SDR-as-a-service — replies worked into calendar invitations that get attended.
Read →Sequenced, tested and tracked — written to be answered, not admired.
Read →